Publications Featuring GCEL

GCEL is not only a tool for financial institutions. It is also used by NGOs, campaigners, journalists and academics worldwide to assess which financial institutions are still investing in our climate’s worst enemy.

Still Banking on Coal

Since 2016, after the COP20 in Paris, the world agreed to limit Global Warming to 1.5 degrees.  In 2021, the International Energy Agency issued its Net Zero by 2050 scenario, underlining the need for a rapid transition out of coal. It was the year in which the Glasgow COP agreed to accelerate the phase-down of coal and in which commercial banks launched the Net Zero Banking Alliance.  2016 should have been a turning point; 2021 should have been a turning point, but the global banking industry missed both turns. Urgewald's research Still Banking on Coal uses the Global Coal Exit List to show that commerical banks still injected $470 billion into the industry since January 2021.

Still Banking on Coal

Banking on Climate Chaos

The world's biggest banks committed of $6.9 trillion to the fossil fuel industry since 2016. Almost half of that amount, $3.3 trillion was for companies opening up new oil and gas resources, building new LNG terminal or pipeline, expanding thei coal mines, and building new coal power plants or gas power plants. This joint NGO report, led by Rainforest Action Network, uses the Global Coal Exit List and the Global Oil & Gas Exit List, to examine commercial and investment bank financing for the fossil fuel industry.

Banking on Climate Chaos

Investing in Climate Chaos

At a time when the UN warns that greenhouse gas emissions must be cut in half by 2030, pension funds, insurers, mutual funds and asset managers are still gambling away our future by sinking money into the world’s worst climate offenders. According to Urgewald's research, over 7,500 institutional investors hold bonds and shares in coal, oil and gas companies from our Global Coal Exit List and our Global Oil & Gas Exit List.

Investing in Climate Chaos

The Great Green Investment Investigation

Even when financial funds claim they are sustainable, they often are not. This was an insight unearthed by the Great Green Investment Investigation that drew on data from Urgewald’s Global Coal Exit List and Global Oil & Gas Exit list. The investigation looked into 1,277 sustainable funds that referenced the environment in their name and compared them to Urgewald’s data. The result: Over 40% of these “sustainable” funds were actually invested in fossil fuel companies. The joint project was conducted by the NGO Follow the Money, the research journalists of investico, and 9 major European media outlets. 

The Great Green Investment Investigation

Who is Financing Fossil Fuel Expansion in Africa?

Urgewald, Stop EACOP, Oilwatch Africa, Africa Coal Network and 33 further African NGOs released the report at the UN Climate Summit in Sharm el-Sheikh in November 2022. The report identifies 200 companies that are exploring or developing new fossil fuel reserves or developing new fossil infrastructure such as liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, pipelines or gas- and coal-fired power plants in Africa.

Who is Financing Fossil Fuel Expansion in Africa?

The Coal Policy Tracker

Our NGO partner Reclaim Finance publishes the Coal Policy Tool. Their tool ranks coal policies of financial institutions and uses GCEL criteria as a baseline for good coal policies.

Coal Policy Tracker